Lawsuit Filed to Eliminate HMO Lien on Work Comp Settlement

My client was injured at work.  Her employer totally controverted the claim.  Because the claim was denied, she sought medical care under her employer sponsored HMO policy. 

Eventually, she and her workers compensation lawyer settled the work comp case as a totally controverted claim.  The HMO sought reimbursement of its alleged lien out of the work comp settlement.  Her work comp lawyer asked the carrier to waive its lien, and the HMO carrier refused.

I filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that there is no lien based on two grounds: 1) work comp proceeds are statutorily exempt from all claims of creditors; and 2) HMO reimbursements are a creature of statute, and the applicable statute only allows HMO's to be reimbursed out of recoveries from "tortfeasors." 

Even though this was an employer sponsored plan, this is not controlled by ERISA.  Even if it were controlled by ERISA, the HMO reimbursement statute is "saved" from ERISA preemption. 

Lawsuit Filed to Eliminate Lien Against Blue Cross and Blue Shield

My client was injured in an automobile accident.  My client was an HMO member through his employer.  The HMO was issued by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida.  After the accident, Blue Cross and Blue Shield provided some medical services to my client that were accident related, and also provided some services that were not related to the accident. 

When the personal injury case was resolved, Blue Cross and Blue Shield requested reimbursement of the entire amount expended on behalf of my client since the date of accident - even for care that was not related to the accident. 

My client's personal injury lawyer requested that the HMO provide him with a copy of the applicable HMO policy.  Although the medical services were rendered in 2007 and 2008, Blue Cross would only give a copy of the 2010 HMO policy. 

The personal injury victim hired me to sue to have the lien eliminated and/or significantly reduced.  Suit has been filed.  I believe that, pursuant to Florida Statute Section 768.76(7), by failing to provide the applicable HMO policy, the insurer has waived any right to request reimbursement.  Further, even if the insurance company is entitled to any reimbursement, it cannot seek reimbursement for non-accident related expenses.  Finally, to the extent that any right of reimbursement exists, the reimbursement must be significantly reduced pursuant to the formula set forth in Section 768.76.

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens. This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

Lawsuit Filed to Eliminate Health Insurance Lien on Personal Injury Settlement

Today, I filed suit against American National Life Insurance Company of Texas which is asserting a lien on a portion of my client's settlement proceeds.  My client lives in Florida, but was injured in New Mexico in an automobile accident.  American National paid for a portion of the medical care related to the accident, and believes that it is entitled to reimbursement for the amounts it paid.  Based on the language of the insurance policy, I do not believe that American National has any lien on the settlement proceeds.  The court will have to decide.   

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens. This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

Another ERISA Lien Completely Eliminated

On January 10, I wrote about a case which I filed in order to eliminate an ERISA health benefits lien that was being asserted against my client's personal injury and uninsured motorists settlement.  The client's personal injury attorney had made a good recovery for the client, but the ERISA plan wanted to be reimbursed 100% of its lien and would not budge. 

I filed a federal declaratory judgment action against the self-funded ERISA plan.  Yesterday, the ERISA plan acknowledged that it had no lien, and waived its alleged lien in full.  

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.
 

Federal Court ERISA Action Filed to Eliminate Lien on PI Recovery

I filed suit today in federal Court against a self-funded ERISA plan which was seeking recovery of a lien against my client's personal injury recovery.  My client was seriously injured in an automobile accident.  The self-funded ERISA plan paid for his medical treatment.  Unfortunately, there was limited bodily injury and uninsured motorists limits available.  My client's personal injury attorney recovered those benefits, but the ERISA plan sought recovery of 100% of its lien. 

As often happens, the personal injury attorney recommended trying to negotiate with the ERISA plan to try to get a reduction of the lien.  And, as often happens, the ERISA plan refused to budge.  (Even if the plan had agreed to a pro rata reduction, that would have been inappropriate to pay in this case.)

The client found me through this blog, and contacted me to see if I could do anything about the lien.  After reviewing the documents, I felt confident that there was no lien at all.  I was retained to file suit and try to eliminate the lien.  Suit has been filed, and I will let you know how it goes. 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.
 

ERISA Lien Completely Eliminated After Dec Action

On June 25, 2009, I wrote that I had been referred a client by a local personal injury firm in order to litigate an ERISA lien.  At the time I received the case, ACS Recoveries was refusing to reduce at all. 

I am happy to announce that today, as a result of our Federal Court Dec Action, the lien holder has agreed to waive its lien in its entirety.   

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.
 

Is The Med Pay Insurer in Your Auto Case Seeking Reimbursement or Subrogation?

Many insurers who are providing med pay coverage for automobile accident victims are now seeking reimbursement or subrogation out of the bodily injury settlements.  In many of those cases, no such right of reimbursement exists.  In the remainder of cases, the med pay insurer will be required to take a substantial reduction in what it is seeking. 

One insidious practice I am seeing is where the med pay carrier and the BI carrier are the same carrier, and the BI carrier is simply forwarding the full amount of the med pay lien to itself.  This, and other attempts by the med pay carriers to obtain full reimbursement are not only a breach of contract and a breach of fiduciary duty on behalf of the med pay carrier, but also constitute bad faith on behalf of the BI carrier.  

In my practice, I am filing dec actions against the med pay insurer when they refuse to waive or, when appropriate, significantly reduce their liens.  Fees and costs are payable under Section 627.428. 

HMO Lien on UM Recovery Does Not Exist

My client settled her UM case for the available uninsured motorists limits.  Her HMO had paid for some of the medical care incurred as a result as the motor vehicle accident.  At the time of settlement, the HMO asserted a lien against the recovery for the full amount of all benefits it paid which were related to the crash. 

I advised the HMO that it had no lien at all, and even if it did, it would only be a small percentage of the amount it was seeking.  The HMO refused to budge and I filed a dec action seeking a declaration that the lien did not exist. 

On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that an HMO has no right of recovery or lien with regard to UM benefits.  This is because, an HMO's right of reimbursement is a creature of statute, and the applicable statute only allows an HMO to be reimbursed if the victim is reimbursed "by a tortfeasor."  Obviously, (or maybe not so obviously, given the fact that we had to litigate this issue to summary judgment) a UM carrier is not a "tortfeasor."  We are now seeking our attorneys fees from the HMO for all fees incurred in the dec action. 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Although this case was brought on behalf of one of our own personal injury clients, frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.  

Lawsuit Filed to Reduce or Eliminate ERISA Health Insurance Lien on BI Recovery

A prominent personal injury firm has referred me their client in order to deal with an ERISA lien which is being asserted against a personal injury settlement.  The lien recovery firm is seeking 100% of the amount paid in medical benefits after an automobile accident, and is refusing to budge.  However, I believe I will be able to show that the medical treatment was not actually caused by the accident.  Instead, according to my client's treating physician, the treatment for which the lien is being asserted would have been needed regardless of the accident. 

Because the lienholder will not agree to waive its lien, I have filed a declaratory judgment action in federal court seeking to have the lien judicially extinguished.  I will keep you posted.

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.
 

ERISA Health Insurance Lien Successfully Reduced

On June 1, I wrote about a declaratory judgment action I filed in order to reduce a $200,000 ERISA health insurance lien.  Prior to receiving the suit, the health insurer took an aggressive stance, and advised my client's personal injury attorney that it would take $142,000 of the personal injury settlement.  Other than that meager reduction, the health insurer refused move off its demand. 

Upon receiving my declaratory judgment action the health insurer agreed to accept $10,000 as payment in full. My client is very pleased with this quick turn of events which provides him with much needed funds following a tragic and life-altering accident. 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance, ERISA, PPO, and HMO liens is complicated and requires experience to unravel.

Many times, personal injury attorneys will recommend that their clients hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate and litigate liens on behalf of the personal injury victims. This removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.  For more information on lien resolution, click the word "Liens" in the right-hand column

Lawsuit Filed to Eliminate ERISA Health Insurance Lien

Our client was severely injured in a car accident and his parents' health insurer paid over $200,000 for medical expenses incurred as a result of the crash.  Our client's personal injury attorney settled the case for the available BI and UM policy limits (plus some additional money from the UM carrier for alleged bad faith).  However, even given the excellent job by our client's personal injury attorney, our client could not be made whole by the settlement. 

The health insurer agreed to reduce its lien pro-rata for the attorneys fees and costs.  However, after reviewing the insurance plan, I do not believe that the ERISA insurer has any right to any of the settlement proceeds.  I filed a declaratory judgment action in federal court seeking a declaration that the ERISA carrier is not entitled to any of the settlement proceeds.  I will keep you apprised of what occurs. 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance, ERISA, PPO, and HMO liens is complicated and requires experience to unravel.

Many times, personal injury attorneys will recommend that their clients hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate and litigate liens on behalf of the personal injury victims. This removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.  For more information on lien resolution, click the word "Liens" in the right-hand column

Claim for Equitable Lien and Constructive Trust Allowed Against Law Firm for Reimbursement of Lien

In Ward Mfg. v. Yeager, 2009 WL 1107891 (E.D. Pa. April 22, 2009), Yeager's injury lawyers recovered money for personal injuries.  Ward had paid medical expenses associated with the injuries, and claimed a right to be reimbursed from the personal injury proceeds.  Ward filed an action under 29 USC Section 1132(a)(3) (2009) against Yeager and his injury lawyers seeking an equitable lien or constructive trust on $37,963.01 held in trust by the injury lawyers. 

Yeager and his lawyers argued that Ward's action was not an authorized equitable action, but instead amounted to an action seeking legal relief.  Ward's action is governed by 29 USC Section 1132(a)(3) which only allows equitable actions, and does not allow actions for legal relief. 

The court held that because

Ward seeks an equitable lien or constructive trust on an identifiable piece of property--namely, the $37,963.01 held in trust--rather than a claim against Yeager's general assets, § 502(a)(3) does authorize this action. See Knudson, 534 U.S. at 213 (noting that "a plaintiff could seek restitution in equity, ordinarily in the form of a constructive trust or an equitable lien, where money or property identified as belonging in good conscience to the plaintiff could clearly be traced to particular funds or property in the defendant's possession .")

 

The Nation Law Firm - Lien Resolution Services Files Summary Judgment in Lawsuit to Eliminate HMO Lien

Avmed HMO asserted a lien, or right of reimbursement, against a portion our client's uninsured motorists settlement.  Although the amount of the alleged Lien - $9,749.51 - is relatively small, it is my position that HMO's never have any lien on UM benefits.  When Avmed refused to voluntarily withdraw its claim of lien, I filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that Avmed had no lien. 

Although HMO's often assert liens against UM benefits, pursuant to our Florida Statutes, an HMO never has a lien against UM benefits.  This is true regardless of what the HMO contract says.  Even if the HMO is governed by ERISA, the "savings clause" of the ERISA statute provides that ERISA does not preempt the "business of insurance." 

Also, even if Avmed HMO had a lien on UM benefits, it would only be entitled to recover a fraction of the amount it was seeking because our client was not "made whole" by the policy limits UM settlement.  Under the "make whole" doctrine a lienholder is not entitled to any reimbursement if the insured was not made whole by the recovery.  The make whole doctrine has been modified in Florida under some circumstances by Section 768.76.  However, even if the entire lien is not eliminated, what the health plan can recover is significantly limited when the injured party is not made whole.  Unfortunately, often times, health insurers, PPO's and HMO's ignore the law and assert liens that do not exist, or demand payments that are exorbitant under the circumstances.  Equally unfortunate, is the fact that many plaintiffs attorneys pay liens that do not exist, or pay significantly more than what is due and owing. 

In this case, cross motions for summary judgment have been filed, and a hearing on the issue is scheduled.  If we are successful, Avmed HMO will be obligated to pay all of our fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action. 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance, ERISA, PPO, and HMO liens is complicated and requires experience to unravel.

Many times, personal injury attorneys will recommend that their clients hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate and litigate liens on behalf of the personal injury victims. This removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.  For more information on lien resolution, click the word "Liens" in the right-hand column. 

Victory in Claim for Health Benefits Against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida

Federico A. was involved in a serious car accident and as a result suffered extensive physical injuries. He was transported to the hospital for several emergency surgeries. The hospital promptly submitted his medical bills to his PPO health insurance company, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, for payment. The treatment had been rendered by a physician who did not participate with Blue Cross as one of its preferred providers (a "non-PPO provider"). Blue Cross denied many of the bills claiming that an assistant surgeon who was utilized in the multiple surgeries was not necessary.  Those bills which Blue Cross did pay were significantly reduced to what Blue Cross refers to as its "allowance."

Federico was referred to us by his personal injury attorney for assistance with his substantial medical bills. Based on prior experience, I believe that current version of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida's PPO policy and the payments made thereunder violate Florida Statutes Sections 627.6044 and 627.6471. Section 627.6044 requires a PPO insurer to specifically identify in the insurance contract the methodology it uses to pay claims. The Blue Cross PPO policy does specifically identify numerous factors which it says will be evaluated in determining the appropriate "allowance." However, in reality, Blue Cross does not utilize any of those factors, and instead relies on only one undisclosed factor. I also believe that the Blue Cross PPO insurance policy violates section 627.6471, by reimbursing non-PPO providers at a rate lower than allowed by law, and by requiring the insureds to pay coinsurance in excess of the statutory maximum.

In addition, after conferring with the treating surgeon, I felt confident that we would be able to prove the necessity of an assistant surgeon for the various procedures.

Based on these factors, I filed suit against Blue Cross for breach of contract. Discovery ensued, but within one week of taking the adjusters' depositions, Blue Cross agreed to settle the case by paying the doctor’s bills.

As part of the settlement, Blue Cross agreed to reduce its lien against the personal injury proceeds from $270,000 to $10,000.  (For more information on reducing and waiving liens, you can search this blog for the word "lien.") Blue Cross also agreed to pay all of my attorneys fees and costs incurred in investigating and prosecuting the case.

Nation Law Firm Victorious in Lawsuit to Reduce ERISA Health Insurance Lien

Recently, a prominent local personal injury law firm asked me to deal with a $192,000 ERISA health insurance lien on a case they had settled. That firm had attempted to negotiate with the lien-holder to reduce the lien, but as is often the case, the lien-holder would not budge. The personal injury victims retained me, and I filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court, for the Middle District of Florida. Soon after the initial Rule 26 meeting, the lien-holder agreed to accept $10,000 as payment in full for their lien.

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and requires experience to unravel.

Many times, personal injury attorneys will recommend that their clients hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate liens on behalf of the personal injury victims. This removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.

 

Nation Law Firm Victorious in Significantly Reducing Health Insurance Lien

Many times, when a lawyer for a personal injury victim settles his or her client's personal injury case, the health insurer will ask for a significant portion of the settlement for reimbursement of expenses which it incurred in paying for health care. This is known as "subrogration" or a "right of reimbursement." 

Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and one should not dabble in it unless experienced.

Frequently, personal injury attorneys will recommend their clients to hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate those liens.  This referral removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

Recently a nationally recognized personal injury law firm asked me to deal with a $650,000 health insurance lien on a case they were trying to settle. After intense negotiations I convinced the health insurance carrier to accept $65,000 as payment in full for the lien. Had the insurer not agreed, I was prepared to file a declaratory judgment action to seek a judicial determination of the amount of the lien. If I was successful in the declaratory judgment action, the insurer would have not only had to reduce or eliminate the lien, but would have also been responsible for my attorney's fees and costs.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.

Nation Law Firm Victorious in Lawsuit to Reduce ERISA Health Insurance Liens

Many times, when a lawyer for a personal injury victim settles his or her client's personal injury case, the health insurer will ask for a significant portion of the settlement for reimbursement of expenses which it incurred in paying for health care. This is known as "subrogation" or a "right of reimbursement." Repeatedly, I have seen cases where good attorneys pay back liens that do not even exist, or they pay back way too much. Paying back liens that don't exist, or paying back too much is a disservice to our clients, and can be considered malpractice. The law on health insurance liens is complicated and requires experience to unravel.

Many times, personal injury attorneys will recommend that their clients hire The Nation Law Firm to negotiate liens on behalf of the personal injury victims. This removes any potential liability from the personal injury attorney, and provides a much needed service to their clients.

Recently, a prominent local personal injury law firm asked me to deal with a $192,000 ERISA health insurance lien on a case they had settled. That firm had attempted to negotiate with the lien-holder to reduce the lien, but the lien-holder would not budge. The personal injury victims retained me, and I filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court, for the Middle District of Florida. Soon after the initial Rule 26 meeting, the lien-holder agreed to accept $10,000 as payment in full for their lien.

I am currently in litigation in numerous such declaratory judgment actions at this time.