Declaratory Judgment Action For Coverage

My client bought liability insurance for his business.  When he presented a claim, his insurance company denied the claim and has voided the policy for what it says were "material misrepresentations" on the application for insurance. 

Specifically, the insurer says that my client misrepresented that he renovated hotel rooms and that he subbed out much of the work.  According to the insurance company, my client only advised them that he performed "demolition" work.  If what the insurance company said is true, then it probably properly denied the claim and voided the policy.  However, they are wrong.

Like almost all applications for business liability coverage, the application which my client filled out contains a place for the insurance agent to insert a business "classification code."  The classification code is a number which corresponds with a certain type of business operations.  The business classification code on my client's application related to demolition and subcontracting the renovation of buildings - precisely what he does for a living.  Therefore, the very application which the insurance company is relying on, proves that the insurer is wrong. 

The insurance company filed a declaratory judgment action against my client seeking a judicial determination that it can void the policy for this "material misrepresentation."  I am defending the dec action claiming that there was no misrepresentation at all. 

As with most of my insurance cases, if I win, the insurance company will have to pay my fees and costs; and if I lose, I'll work for free.

Another Lawsuit Filed For Roof Damage Due to March 30, 2011 Storm

On March 30, 2011 a severe unnamed storm hit Central Florida with high winds, rain and hail.  Since then I have filed at least 20 lawsuits against various homeowners insurers for wrongly denying roof damage claims.  Most of those cases were immediately settled by the insurance company as soon as they received the lawsuits. 

Yesterday, I settled another one, and filed another lawsuit on a new one.  In most of these cases, the insurance company has hired a roof consultant or an engineer to say that the roof is old and has no wind damage.  In each of the cases, I have been able to document that the roof was fine before the March 30 storm and sustained severe wind damage as a result of the storm. 

The team I assemble in these cases typically includes a qualified roofer, an engineer, and a forensic meteorologist. 

In almost all of my roof cases, the insurance company is required to pay my fees and costs if I win, and if I lose I work for free.